We are located at the top of the intersection of NW 185th Avenue and Germantown Road. We're the "church on the hill."
18245 NW Germantown Road
Portland OR 97231
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on September 9, 2015 under AM Bible Study | 
Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; September 9, 2015 from Judges 13:25-14:20
Theme: The apparent ups and downs of life, without our knowing it, accomplish the purposes of God.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on September 2, 2015 under AM Bible Study | Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; September 2, 2015 from Judges 13:1-25
Theme: There are some lessons about God that we can learn from Samson’s mother and father.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on August 26, 2015 under AM Bible Study | Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; August 26, 2015 from Judges 12:8-15
Theme: This passage tells us of three judges who kept the peace in Israel between periods of trouble.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on August 19, 2015 under AM Bible Study | Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; August 19, 2015 from Judges 12:1-7
Theme: Jephthah’s sad conflict with the tribe of Ephriam teaches us the destructive divisiveness that comes from of a love of ‘first place’.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
The stories of many of the judges, as well as many of the great heroes of the Bible in general, have a mixture of good and bad in them—of great victory and of sad tragedy. This seems more true of Jephthah than of any of the other judges. We read of his tragic family life (11:1-3), then of his exaltation to honor (11:4-11); then of his wise diplomacy (11:12-28), but of his unwise vow (11:29-31); and finally of his great victory (11:32-33), and then of his tragic loss (11:34-40). And now, even after God had brought about a victory for Israel through his leadership against a hostile enemy, he now suffers the hostility of another tribe from among his own people.
The hostility comes from the tribe of Ephriam—a tribe that, sadly, already had a history of contentiousness. Because of pride and the passion to be thought of as ‘first’ among the tribes, they contended with Jephthah—the man God used to protect them—in a very unreasonable and ungracious way. Their behavior brings to mind another example of the same attitude of pride from the New Testament. The apostle John described the destructive nature of this attitude in his third letter;
I wrote to the church, but Diotrephes, who loves to have the preeminence among them, does not receive us. Therefore, if I come, I will call to mind his deeds which he does, prating against us with malicious words. And not content with that, he himself does not receive the brethren, and forbids those who wish to, putting them out of the church. Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. He who does good is of God, but he who does evil has not seen God (3 John 9-11).
The story of Jephthah’s conflict with Ephriam warns us of the danger of this Diotrephian spirit. Notice . . .
I. EPHRIAM’S COMPLAINT (v. 1).
A. After the victory that God brought about for the people of Gilead against the oppressive Ammonite people, the tribe of Ephriam—a tribe who dwelt on the other side of the Jordan—confronted Jephthah. We’re told, “Then the men of Ephraim gathered together, crossed over toward Zaphon, and said to Jephthah, ‘Why did you cross over to fight against the people of Ammon, and did not call us to go with you?’” (v. 1a). Why would Ephriam take this attitude? It is, most likely, because they considered that they were a tribe that held a position of primacy over the others; and they felt that they ought to be consulted in all matters that concerned the land of Israel and involved in every matter. They, after all, were the tribe from which Joshua had come and in which he had been buried (Joshua 24:30). The tabernacle that Moses built was kept in Ephriam in the town of Shiloh; and it was there that the people of Israel would go to worship (1 Samuel 1:3, 9). The great patriarch Jacob placed the tribe’s founding father over the founding father of Menassah in his blessing (Genesis 48:8-20); and Gilead was of Menassah.
B. We saw this ‘first-place’ attitude from Ephriam at an earlier time in the Book of Judges—back in the story of Gideon. They confronted that earlier judge in his conflict with the Midianites in almost the same way (see Judges 8:1-3). Gideon was able to calm them with a gentle answer; but in the case of Jephthah, the attitude from Ephriam was much more harsh; “We will burn your house down on you with fire!” (v. 1b).
II. JEPHTHAH’S DEFENSE (vv. 2-3).
A. Perhaps Jephthah was battle-worn, or perhaps he was still grieving over the loss his suffered from his rash vow. It may even be that it was just not in Jephthah’s nature to give the kind of gentle answer that Gideon gave (see 11:1-3). Nevertheless, Jephthah’s answer was a reasonable one: “And Jephthah said to them, ‘My people and I were in a great struggle with the people of Ammon; and when I called you, you did not deliver me out of their hands. So when I saw that you would not deliver me, I took my life in my hands and crossed over against the people of Ammon; and the Lord delivered them into my hand. Why then have you come up to me this day to fight against me?’” (vv. 2-3). Apparently, Jephthah had called them for help; but they did not come. Gideon made it sound as if Ephriam was in a place of honor; but Jephthah’s answer made them appear to be a bunch of prima donnas.
B. Would things have been different if Jephthah had given a more diplomatic response? It may well have been so. Proverbs 15:1 is a principle that we can always rely on: “A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” May God help us to be more Gideon-like than Jephthah-like in responding to confrontation. But the hand of God’s providence can also be seen in the outcome. After all, the next phase of Israel’s history would be the establishment of the monarchy—first through Benjamin (under Saul), and then through Judah (under David). Some commentators suggest that had Ephriam not been humbled as a result of their conflict with Gilead, they may never have submitted as a whole nation under one king.
III. GILEAD’S VICTORY (v. 4).
A. The heat was definitely on; and we’re told, “Now Jephthah gathered together all the men of Gilead and fought against Ephraim. And the men of Gilead defeated Ephraim, because they said, “You Gileadites are fugitives of Ephraim among the Ephraimites and among the Manassites” (v. 4). It appears that the people of Ephriam had become completely insulting and utterly impossible to reason with—suggesting that, because of their sole effort in the conflict with Ammon, the people of Gilead were rebels and renegades.
B. It seems that the insulting and degrading attitude of Ephriam toward Gilead stirred up a people already red hot from battle. It was a very unwise thing to do. But more; it was terribly ungrateful. After all, if Gilead had not defeated Ammon, that oppressive pagan people group would most certainly have turned to oppress Ephriam! May God keep us from the ungraciousness and unthankful spirit that comes from this love of being thought ‘first’!
IV. EPHRIAM’S HUMILIATION (vv. 5-6).
A. We’re told that, in this conflict, “The Gileadites seized the fords of the Jordan before the Ephraimites arrived” (v. 5a). And they set up a security system based on dialect. The people of Ephriam couldn’t pronounce “sh” sounds—speaking them with an “s” sound instead. “And when any Ephraimite who escaped said, ‘Let me cross over,’ the men of Gilead would say to him, ‘Are you an Ephraimite?’ If he said, ‘No,’ then they would say to him, ‘Then say, “Shibboleth”!’” That word meant “a flowing stream”—which, of course, was what they had captured. “And he would say, ‘Shibboleth,’ for he could not pronounce it right. Then they would take him and kill him at the fords of the Jordan” (vv. 5b-6a). The mere mispronunciation of a word revealed their identity (see also Matthew 26:73).
B. It was a clever tactic; but the results were terrible. We’re told, “There fell at that time forty-two thousand Ephraimites” (v. 6b). What a picture, by the way, of Proverbs 18:7; “A fool’s mouth is his destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul.” Verse 21 says, “Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruit.” Their pride motivated their words against Jephthah; and in the end, their words destroyed them. May God keep us far from the words that come from a sinful heart!
V. JEPHTHAH’S REPUTATION (v. 7).
A. The story closes with this: “And Jephthah judged Israel six years. Then Jephthah the Gileadite died and was buried in among the cities of Gilead” (v. 7). Note that he is called by the name that the people of Ephriam had despised and belittled—Gilead!
B. Perhaps we should see a hint of tragedy. Jephthah only served for six years—perhaps, as one commentator suggest—worn and weary from a life of conflict and tragedy; nevertheless used by God.
* * * * * * * * *
Ephraim’s example helps to illustrate to us the warning we receive from Proverbs 25:6-7
Do not exalt yourself in the presence of the king,
And do not stand in the place of the great;
For it is better that he say to you,
“Come up here,”
Than that you should be put lower in the presence of the prince,
Whom your eyes have seen (Proverbs 25:6-7).
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on August 12, 2015 under AM Bible Study | Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; August 12, 2015 from Judges 11:28-40
Theme: Jephthah’s vow warns us of the seriousness with which God takes our promises.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
We come this morning to a very controversial passage—one that is ethically perplexing and variously interpreted. But however it is understood, it still has a great lesson to teach us.
It’s a passage that shows us that God takes our promises to Him seriously—and that we need to take them seriously too. We tend to make promises to God in far too reckless a manner. As it says in Ecclesiastes 5:4-5; When you make a vow to God, do not delay to pay it; for He has no pleasure in fools. Pay what you have vowed—better not to vow than to vow and not pay.” In the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord Jesus warned us not to make vows; telling us, “But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one” (Matthew 5:37). Before God, if promises are made, they must be paid—and that’s because God Himself is a promise keeper.
The vow of the mighty judge Jephthah was one that was made before God—but one that was tragically hard to pay. And this makes his story a very important cautionary tale.
I. THE VOW THAT WAS MADE (vv. 28-31).
A. The story of this vow was in the context of God’s call upon the life of Jephthah to deliver His people from the oppression of the Ammonites. They were aggressively—and as we saw in the previous verses unjustly—claiming the land that Israel occupied. He had made a powerful argument against them; “ However, the king of the people of Ammon did not heed the words which Jephthah sent him” (v. 28). And so, the battle was on.
B. It’s important to know that Jephthah was a man who was empowered and enabled by God. We’re told. “Then the Spirit of the Lord came upon Jephthah, and he passed through Gilead and Manasseh, and passed through Mizpah of Gilead; and from Mizpah of Gilead he advanced toward the people of Ammon” (v. 29). He made his way to the enemy with a sense of God’s enabling presence. It’s important to the context of this story to remember that this man was highlighted in Hebrews 11 as a man who entered into this conflict by faith (see Hebrews 11:32-34). He was no rash pagan—and God’s hand was definitely upon him! And perhaps because of his faith, he felt free to make the vow we’re told about in verses 30-31). “And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord, and said, ‘If You will indeed deliver the people of Ammon into my hands, then it will be that whatever comes out of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the people of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord’s, and I will offer it up as a burnt offering.’”
C. Was it necessary to make this vow? It seems pretty clear that it was not. A commitment had already been made before God by Jephthah and the people (vv. 9-11); and it’s clear that the Spirit of the Lord was already upon Jephthah (v. 29). Perhaps a lesson to be learned is that we are in the most danger of falling into a rash vow before God at a time when we feel most confident in doing so! May God help us to be on guard during the spiritual ‘highs’ as much as in the ‘lows’!
II. THE VICTORY THAT WAS GRANTED (vv. 32-33).
A. The sense that Jephthah was in God’s hand already is made even more clear by the fact that God gave a great victory. In fact, it was the Lord who had delivered the Ammonites into his hand—just as he had asked in his vow. “So Jephthah advanced toward the people of Ammon to fight against them, and the Lord delivered them into his hands. And he defeated them from Aroer as far as Minnith—twenty cities—and to Abel Keramim, with a very great slaughter. Thus the people of Ammon were subdued before the children of Israel” (vv. 32-33).
B. The details that are given to us in this victory are frustratingly brief. There are no exciting stories of heroism given to us. It seems that the writer is mostly concerned about the story that will follow—the story of the sad consequences of this vow. In fact, as one commentator put it, you can almost say that Jephthah—the victor in the story—suffered more deeply in the end than the victims! Because of the vow that was made, it truly became a tragic and sad victory; a victory that would have been made far more joyful if the vow had never been made.
III. THE VICTIM THAT CAME FORTH (vv. 34-35).
A. When Jephthah made his vow, he may not have been thinking that a human being would come out to greet him—although it would have been hard to imagine a mere animal coming out of the door to “meet” him at his return. But what a tragic turn of events it was. We’re told, “When Jephthah came to his house at Mizpah, there was his daughter, coming out to meet him with timbrels and dancing; and she was his only child. Besides her he had neither son nor daughter” (v. 34). It may have been that she had prepared herself to come out to greet him in the joyful way that Miriam—the sister of Moses—celebrated the victory over the Egyptians in the Red Sea (see Exodus 15:20-21). But it brought no joy to Jephthah’s heart.
B. It’s important to remember that Jephthah’s whole family story had been a tragic one. His brothers had despised him and rejected him because of his questionable birth (see vv. 1-3); and he was truly a loner. His daughter would have been all the more precious to him because of his past; and she would have represented his only hope for the future. How tragic then that we read, “And it came to pass, when he saw her, that he tore his clothes, and said, ‘Alas, my daughter! You have brought me very low! You are among those who trouble me! For I have given my word to the Lord, and I cannot go back on it’” (v. 35). Note in this, however, that there was no question in his mind. He made a vow; and now he must keep it. She must be offered to the Lord.
IV. THE VIRGINITY THAT WAS BEWAILED (vv. 36-40).
A. But how was she offered? The matter is much debated. Some say that she was offered as a literal burnt offering. They would point back to the story of Abraham’s offering of Isaac as an example (Genesis 22). But Abraham’s act was commanded by God—not as a result of a vow; and it was stopped before Isaac could be slain. Surely Jephthah would have known that he could not sin against God and slay his daughter. Micah 6:7 asks, “Shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?”—with the clear implication that no such offering would ever be accepted. Instead, it seems most sensible to see this as a figurative “burnt offering”—an offering of full dedication, as a burnt offering would be; but without the literal full consumption by fire. It seems instead to see this best as a full dedication of Jephthah’s daughter—with the full loss of Jephthah’s future of a family line. His daughter was in full and faithful submission with reverence toward God: “So she said to him, “My father, if you have given your word to the Lord, do to me according to what has gone out of your mouth, because the Lord has avenged you of your enemies, the people of Ammon” (v. 36). She would be the sacrifice Jephthah had pledged—with her own future as a wife and a mother and a bearer of Jephthah’s offspring as the offering to be made.
B. That this was a figurative offering of Jephthah’s own future is further implied by the request of his daughter: “Then she said to her father, ‘Let this thing be done for me: let me alone for two months, that I may go and wander on the mountains and bewail my virginity, my friends and I.’ So he said, ‘Go.’ And he sent her away for two months; and she went with her friends, and bewailed her virginity on the mountains” (vv. 37-38). To “bewail her virginity” meant that she and her companions spent two months of mourning over the fact that she would never experience the joy of being a wife or a mother. She would be devoted—life-long—to the Lord in celibacy and childlessness. This would be a great loss to her; and perhaps an even greater loss to her father. “And it was so at the end of two months that she returned to her father, and he carried out his vow with her which he had vowed. She knew no man. And it became a custom in Israel that the daughters of Israel went four days each year to lament the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite” (vv. 39-40).
* * * * * * * * * *
Psalm 15:4 says that God honors the man who so fears Him that he “swears to his own hurt and does not change”. God takes the promises we make to Him very seriously. May He help us to never make rash vows.
Posted by Pastor Greg Allen on July 22, 2015 under AM Bible Study | Be the First to Comment
AM Bible Study Group; July 22, 2015 from Judges 11:12-27
Theme: The mercy of God is shown in that He could not endure the misery of His unfaithful people.
(All Scripture is taken from The New King James Version, unless otherwise indicated).
Once, when Jesus was accused of casting out demons by the power of the devil, He said this: “No one can enter a strong man’s house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man. And then he will plunder his house” (Mark 3:27). The devil is that ‘strong man’; and he is helpless before the Son of God. But even after the Lord Jesus has plundered the devil’s kingdom and saved some of his former captives, the devil nevertheless argues and fusses and opposes. Think of all the ways he shoots his fiery darts at us, or seeks to discourage us, or roars against us, or lies to us, or accuses us! And yet, we’re told, “Resist him, steadfast in the faith” (1 Peter 5:9); and are told that if we resist him, “he will flee from you” (James 4:7).
The story of the judge Jephthah’s stand against the oppressive Ammonites illustrates this to us. The people of Israel had been disobedient to God; and He had allowed the wicked people groups around them to oppress them. But they returned to the Lord; and He—in mercy—raised up Jephthah to be their defender. His rise to action illustrates to us how we need to take a bold stand against the devil’s lies and tactics, and to cling faithfully to what God has graciously given us through Christ our Savior.
I. THE CONFRONTATION OF THE ENEMY (vv. 12-13).
A. The story is taken up after Jephthah was called by his people to be their defender, and after he and they had made an agreement before God together (10:17-11:11). And now, having entered into this binding agreement before the Lord to be their leader, Jephthah boldly confronts their oppressor. We’re told, “Now Jephthah sent messengers to the king of the people of Ammon, saying, ‘What do you have against me, that you have come to fight against me in my land?’ And the king of the people of Ammon answered the messengers of Jephthah, ‘Because Israel took away my land when they came up out of Egypt, from the Arnon as far as the Jabbok, and to the Jordan. Now therefore, restore those lands peaceably’” (vv. 12-13). And what’s so interesting about this is that what they said never actually happened! 300 years had passed since Israel came up from Egypt; and in that time, the people of Ammon had twisted the facts. As Numbers 21 shows us, the people of Israel went into the borders of Ammon; but it was the land of the Amorite people that they conquered and took possession of—not of the Ammonites!
B. It is wise for us not to try to even speak to the devil or to debate with him about his charges against us. But it is very important to know that when he speaks, “he is a liar and the father of it” (John 8:44). Whenever he stands in opposition to our rights in Christ, he does so through twisting the truth. Though we ought not to even engage him personally, we do have to deal with the people he deceives; and our method with them ought to be to confront the devil’s lies with the word of God’s truth.
II. THE SETTING FORTH OF THE DEFENSE (vv. 14-26).
Jephthah responded to the false declaration of the king of Ammon. And notice that he does so through four main lines of argument:
A. First, notice that he doe so through the line of historical facts:
So Jephthah again sent messengers to the king of the people of Ammon, and said to him, “Thus says Jephthah: ‘Israel did not take away the land of Moab, nor the land of the people of Ammon; for when Israel came up from Egypt, they walked through the wilderness as far as the Red Sea and came to Kadesh. Then Israel sent messengers to the king of Edom, saying, “Please let me pass through your land.” But the king of Edom would not heed. And in like manner they sent to the king of Moab, but he would not consent. So Israel remained in Kadesh. And they went along through the wilderness and bypassed the land of Edom and the land of Moab, came to the east side of the land of Moab, and encamped on the other side of the Arnon. But they did not enter the border of Moab, for the Arnon was the border of Moab. Then Israel sent messengers to Sihon king of the Amorites, king of Heshbon; and Israel said to him, “Please let us pass through your land into our place.” But Sihon did not trust Israel to pass through his territory. So Sihon gathered all his people together, encamped in Jahaz, and fought against Israel. And the Lord God of Israel delivered Sihon and all his people into the hand of Israel, and they defeated them. Thus Israel gained possession of all the land of the Amorites, who inhabited that country. They took possession of all the territory of the Amorites, from the Arnon to the Jabbok and from the wilderness to the Jordan” (vv. 14-22).
All of this is recorded for us in the historical record from Numbers 21:21-32. Israel took nothing aggressively. What the people of Israel had gained, they gained because they were attacked—and because God gave it to them. And what they gained wasn’t even from the Ammonites. It was from the Amorites! Our faith in Jesus—and our rich inheritance in Him—is based on facts!
B. Note then that he argues from theology. Jephthah said, “‘And now the Lord God of Israel has dispossessed the Amorites from before His people Israel; should you then possess it? Will you not possess whatever Chemosh your god gives you to possess? So whatever the Lord our God takes possession of before us, we will possess’” (vv. 23-24). The god Chemosh was the false god of the Moabite people; and it appears that the Amorite people lost their possessions because they had associated themselves with those who were hostile to God’s people. Jephthah is not here saying that Chemosh was a real god. He was simply arguing rhetorically that what the Amorites would think with respect to their false god, the people of Israel should believe with respect to what God gives them. We have a right to lay claim to whatever God gives us in Christ. As Paul wrote, “He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?” (Romans 8:32).
C. Jephthah then argues from what we might call ‘precedent’. He says, “’And now, are you any better than Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab? Did he ever strive against Israel? Did he ever fight against them?’” (v. 25). This points us back to the story of Numbers 23-24; where Balak—the king of Moab—hired the prophet Balaam against God’s people. He sought to curse them, and he did seek later to deceive them; but he did not attack them by warfare—as the Amorites did. Was Ammon now thinking itself better than the king of Moab?—daring to lay a hand on God’s chosen people? “Woe to him who strives with his Maker!” (Isaiah 45:9).
D. Finally, Jephthah argues from what seems like ‘a statute of limitations’. Although Ammon had no legitimate claim for which to argue; Jephthah asks the Ammonite king, “’While Israel dwelt in Heshbon and its villages, in Aroer and its villages, and in all the cities along the banks of the Arnon, for three hundred years, why did you not recover them within that time?’” (vv. 26). The answer would be, of course, because they could not. God kept the people of Israel in His hand. But even if they could, three-hundred-years’ of inaction was more than sufficient to forfeit any claim they might have had. What God gives to His people, no amount of time can overturn. “Who shall bring a charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us” (Romans 8:33-34).
III. THE STAND THAT WAS TAKEN (v. 27).
Jephthah closes with these words; “’Therefore I have not sinned against you, but you wronged me by fighting against me. May the Lord, the Judge, render judgment this day between the children of Israel and the people of Ammon’” (v. 27). What a great argument! It’s like the Lord’s own argument for His people in Zechariah 3:2; “The Lord rebuke you, Satan! The Lord who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” Truly, there can be no better argument than that! “What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?” (Romans 8:31).
* * * * * * * * * *
As we see next in the story, the people of Ammon did not heed the words of Jephthah (v. 28). They could have said, “You have made a convincing case, Jephthah. We will back off and let Israel alone.” But they didn’t. Instead, they remained aggressive—and ended up a defeated people.
Let’s learn the lesson from this: Our God stands to the defense of those who take their stand on His promises. Let’s never let the devil sway us from them.
